I welcome you
to our second installment of reading Clockwork Orange Angel with a decent bit
of salt.
Last time we
met our 2 male protagonists - Jem and Will, we found out their main occupation
and also established the organization representing the baddies of this book.
Now we fast forward to our heroine/wallflower Tessa Grey, coming into
Southampton on a ferry in the merry month of May.
Kudos for
specifying the time, it is just more fun this way, however not where she is
going. We get a description of Tessas` love for her Clockwork angel - a
mysterious brass clockwork pendant which her mother wore when she died and
Tessa is wearing as we speak. It ticks and seems to be working even though
nobody has wound it. Name dropping aside, I like this passage, it enforces the
idea later in books that the pendant supports Tessas` existence. Which is ok
until we realize that Tessa had existed for a good while just fine without the
angel around her neck. But details, details, who needs those.
She arrives
to Southampton following death of her aunt and an invitation and a steamship
ticket from her brother - Nate. He insisted that she came to Southampton and
not Liverpool because Southampton has nicer weather and not because Southampton
is closer for him to pick her up as he lives in London, because that is logic,
folks. Then there is a fact that Liverpool was far more industrial and
therefore not that nice in general, so why is Liverpool mentioned at all?
Perhaps the author wanted to let us know that she actually researched this.
Which is not bad, I can totally get behind this as long as it has some meaning
for the story other than “Ha! I researched that, now admire my
resourcefulness!” for the author. Proposing her to go to Southampton based
entirely on weather forecast makes Nates` excuse and Everything about him super
suspicious. Perhaps this was a tool author used to render him
untrustworthy to readers, but it also rendered him daft. Fair enough, carrying
on.
Tessa
observes that the weather in Southampton is not nice after all - cold rain and
general clamminess. I mean, this is not the best first impression of a town,
but weather changes, rain stops, unless the entire city is secretly owned by
the Addams family. Still, trademark UK downpour? I will start with my pet peeve
- the Location. Many good novels and stories are set in London/England. Yet
whenever we come across descriptions of London in this book, it is cold/rainy,
dour, polluted and dangerous. Whilst this may be true in some cases, especially
keeping the fictional age in mind, it feels like London has a
timezone/microclimate of its own with a permanent rain cloud above. I have been
to London only once, in February which is by far not the prettiest month to be
there, I still experienced a variety of weather conditions ranging from grey
drizzle and wind to crisp, dry and cold sunshine.
According to
sunlight averages, air pollution aside, annually London does receive an average
of 1000 hours of sunshine less than New York. From character perspective of
Tessa Grey it makes sense that London always seems grim because of the lack of
sunlight she has been used to, associations with loss, insecurity and trauma if
she felt those that is.
Returning to
text, we get the description of Tessas` state - technically she is a
homeless person. Having lived in relative poverty, exactly how relative, I will
soon elaborate. Once her aunt and sole breadwinner in their household died, she
sold most of her belongings to pay the funeral and then followed her brother to
London. Which seems sound, but not so much once we read more into the book and
look into history.
Back in the
day children worked. Yes, those factories did not run themselves. Yes it
sucked. In her day and age Tessa would have worked in a factory, a cotton mill
or a coal mine, less likely - as a chimneysweep. Especially given the
circumstances they lived in - her aunt being the sole breadwinner in household
would not have worked when she had 2 extra mouths to feed. Women and children
were paid half or even less of what a grown man would earn. Only in 1876 did
the Working Men`s Party propose banning the employment of children under age of
14 and womens rights for equal wages was only established in 1903 and the
book is set in 1878 where Tessa is 15 or 16 and nobody gives a damn about
poor children. Heck, not all poor children could even attend school, so the
fact that she and her brother could read and write means that their aunt could
afford schooling them. Tessa and her brother had, in fact, enjoyed quite a
luxurious life reserved only to children in upper classes. Did Tessa or Nate
work? If so, then where? How poor exactly were they? Where exactly did her Aunt
work? Did they inherit something?

Tessa at
tender age of 8?
Here we come
to doubt number two. Later in book Nate is described as a kind of guy you would
not trust. We do not know this, Tessa, on the other hand has grown up with him.
So selling all her belongings and sailing off to be met by her not very
trustworthy brother is not smart indeed. I will chalk it up to post-traumatic
confusion.
We get the
sad part where no one waved her goodbye when she left New York. I like this bit
of sentiment - though it would have worked better in another setting - in a
setting where she actually mourned her aunt`s death, considered the odds of
surviving in London, better yet - surviving her trip to London - did she take
her own food or did she have meals on the ferry? Was that included in the price
of the ticket? And other such vital concerns. Here, however she just notes to
herself that it was not merry memory indeed, despite the sky being blue and
brass band playing since no one waved to her. We do get this little snipplet
-it had been
nearly two weeks since she had spoken to a soul, having kept almost entirely to
herslef
In 1820 ships
were covering similar distance in 11 days. Other than doubting travel duration
of a steam ship from New York to Southampton in late 1870s we find out that
Tessa is either incredibly shy, a hermit or is mourning for something
unbeknownst to us. If you see the same faces on the boat for around 2 weeks,
you or they eventually will start a conversation, unless you purposefully avoid
it. In fact - it would be even advisable - people going in the same direction
as you might know more about where you are going. They may offer advice or even
help if they like you enough. Having friends in a new, unknown, possibly
hostile place always helps. The author does not mention if Tessa did anything
else on the boat - perhaps reading? She seems to enjoy that quite a lot.
However all she seems to have done is meditate on her clockwork pendant and
reminisce about how much she loved it, for almost two weeks.
So Tessa
disembarks and Nate is not there to meet her. Instead there is this creepy man
who knows her name and tells her that Nate sent him. Whilst cringing she
decides to follow him through the crowd until she abruptly stops in front of a
black, gleaming cab that has golden letters across its side But
-the rain and
mist were too thick for Tessa to see them clearly.-
This leads me
to believe that either Tessa has some problems with eyesight or the mist is
supernaturally thick. She is supposedly standing in front of the cab, capable
of distinguishing that the letters are gold, but does not see well enough to
read the name. That pesky London mist, hiding the name of the secret
organization responsible for 97% of Londons` supernatural crime!
We get our
first gander at the main antagonists of this book, this is not even a spoiler.
No, seriously - two women of unidentifiable age - one tall and bony, the other
- plump and short with hands so large they resemble paws, dressed like pimps.
They introduce themselves as sisters - Mrs Black and Mrs Dark. Later in book
they go by the name “The Dark sisters”, but, humm, seriously? Their address
implies that at least one of them has married. But the “Dark” implies that it
is their family name. If only one of them did get married, did she look for a
man whos` surname was “Black”, just to match her family name and occupation? If
they were pseudonyms, perhaps they could have chosen something slightly less
plot-obvious - like generic English surnames of that time? There is nothing
wrong with descriptive surnames per se, some classic writers used them like
whoa. But it is a bit tricky to keep the suspense if the name of the villain is
Mr. Baddy McBaddins.

Mrs. Dark is
ready to prowl the streets unnoticed
By the way we
never get their first names. And we never get to know if Mrs Dark kept her
family name after marriage/married someone who had the same family name/her
male relative/just decided to start calling herself Mrs, since she was already
past the age where calling one Miss would be appropriate?
We will never
know as they are minions and only exist to remind us how awful they are.
The Dark
sisters explain Tessa that Nate is busy and sent them to meet her. Naturally
Tessa, not having worked a single day in her life, is a bit surprised and
disappointed that in the middle of the day her bro may be busy - again, we are
not talking about nowadays one-day-notice absences, we are talking about 10-12
hour working day in Victorian London, depending on occupation.
All is
suddenly ok, as the Dark sisters hand Tessa a note where Nate approves of them.
Let me reiterate, her not wholly trustworthy brother sent two women that look
like pimps and go by names “Black” and “Dark” to pick her up and gave them his
highest recommendation on a note of paper that The Dark sisters themselves
produced. Run Tessa, RUN!
Now, the book
does mention that it was explicitly Nates` handwriting, for all we know he
might have sold her off to a brothel to settle his gambling debts. Again, we
are not supposed to know it yet, Tessa has known him all her life. Oh, sancta
innocentia!
And so they
clambered into the carriage but not before the mist clears conveniently
revealing the aforementioned Ouroboros and a name - Pandemonium Club. OMG
Another Clue and all that in just the first chapter!
This closes
chapter one, dear readers, all the main players are introduced, you may as well
stop reading here. But do not fret, I might be back with the following chapter!
Šo komentāru ir noņēmis autors.
AtbildētDzēst